For an inference question, combine all relevant details rather than relying on the passage's opening claim. Pay special attention to evidence that complicates an initial interpretation, and reject choices that introduce an unsupported motive, exaggerate a limited pattern, or ignore evidence pointing in the opposite direction.
Hints
- Hint 1
Prioritize direct evidence
Distinguish what critics inferred from the final collection from what Moss's handwritten corrections directly show.
- Hint 2
Track both directions
Notice that Moss changed some language toward standard forms but changed other language back toward regional forms.
- Hint 3
Compare poem types
Consider why the difference between poems with named speakers and poems without identified speakers matters.
Step-by-step
- Step 1
Identify the complication
The letters suggest that Moss opposed editors who removed regional speech, but the proofs show that she personally replaced some regional spellings with standard ones.
- Step 2
Compare her different revisions
Moss restored regional sentence patterns while treating regional spelling differently in poems with named speakers and poems without identified speakers. Her revisions therefore do not follow a simple preference for either complete standardization or complete preservation.
- Step 3
Draw the supported inference
The contrasting revisions indicate that Moss considered how each regional feature functioned in a particular poem. Thus, her resistance to standardization was selective rather than categorical.