Question 153·200 Super-Hard SAT Reading Questions·Information and Ideas
Populations of the marine snail Littorina saxatilis living on wave-exposed shores often have thicker shells than populations in sheltered coves. To investigate whether this difference is an inherited local adaptation or a developmental response to water movement, marine biologist Aisha Raman and colleagues collected adult females from both environments. The researchers raised the females’ offspring from hatching under either weak or strong simulated water flow while keeping diet and temperature constant. Offspring of exposed-shore females developed thicker shells under both flow conditions, whereas flow strength itself had no measurable effect. Maternal effects—in which a mother’s environment influences her offspring without altering their genes—can persist in the first generation raised in a common environment but generally fade in later generations. The researchers did not breed the laboratory-raised offspring to produce a second generation. Together, these results suggest ______
Which choice most logically completes the text?
For an inference question about an experiment, separate the results from the study’s limitations. Determine which explanation the findings weaken, then identify which competing explanations the design cannot distinguish. Prefer a qualified conclusion that reflects both points over an option that claims one unresolved explanation has been proved.
Hints
Separate the two findings
Consider what is shown by the lack of an effect from flow strength and what is shown by the persistent difference between the two groups of offspring.
Use the stated limitation
Ask why producing a second laboratory generation would help the researchers distinguish between two possible explanations.
Avoid conclusions that are too strong
Choose the option that reflects both what the experiment challenges and what it leaves unresolved.
Step-by-step Explanation
Identify what the flow treatment shows
Offspring raised under strong and weak flow did not differ because of flow strength. Thus, the results do not support the idea that exposure to water movement directly produces thicker shells during development.
Interpret the population difference
Offspring of exposed-shore females had thicker shells in both laboratory conditions. This persistence indicates that the difference is associated with the offspring’s population of origin rather than with the laboratory flow treatment.
Account for the experiment’s limitation
A first-generation study cannot determine whether the persistent difference comes from genes or from maternal effects. Therefore, the evidence weakens the direct developmental explanation without proving genetic adaptation.