For a demanding transition question, determine the argumentative function of the sentence after the blank and the direction of the logic between sentences. Distinguish transitions that introduce a reason from those that merely add information, mark coexistence, or introduce a result.
Hints
- Hint 1
Trace the argument
Determine whether the final sentence presents a result of the preceding claim or a reason that supports it.
- Hint 2
Check the logical direction
The general principle about evidence explains why accepting one conclusion does not require accepting the other.
Step-by-step
- Step 1
Identify the disputed point
Some reviewers consider Shah’s claims inconsistent because he accepts what spectroscopy reveals about the fading process while rejecting an inference about Velez’s intentions.
- Step 2
Determine the final sentence’s role
The final sentence states a general principle: evidence that establishes how an effect occurred does not necessarily establish the purpose behind that effect. This principle supports the claim that Shah’s two conclusions address different questions.
- Step 3
Choose the supporting transition
The transition must introduce a reason for the preceding claim, not merely add a related point, indicate simultaneity, or present a consequence. “After all,” serves this justificatory function.