For a cross-text connection question, first summarize the interpretive framework supplied by one text, including any distinctions it makes. Then apply that framework to the specific actions or images in the other text. Prefer the option that accounts for all relevant details and preserves the framework's qualifications rather than selecting an option that represents only one rejected extreme.
Hints
- Hint 1
Notice the contrast
Compare Inez's initial reaction to the repair with what she ultimately does at the concert.
- Hint 2
Identify Text 2's two rejected extremes
Text 2 distinguishes its view from both erasing evidence of damage and treating a repaired object only as a record of the past.
- Hint 3
Account for both details
Choose the option that explains why the strip remains visible and why Inez adds material that her grandfather did not write.
Step-by-step
- Step 1
Trace Inez's changing response
Inez initially dislikes the conspicuous repair because it seems to revise her grandfather's work. At the concert, however, she accepts the violin's altered sound and uses it to perform her own ending to the unfinished suite.
- Step 2
Apply Text 2's framework
Text 2 distinguishes its interpretation from two extremes: pretending that tradition remains unchanged and preserving the past only as a memorial. A visibly repaired but usable object instead allows a character to recognize disruption while taking new action.
- Step 3
Select the complete interpretation
The strip preserves evidence of the fire, while Inez's ending demonstrates creative action grounded in, but not controlled by, her inheritance. Therefore, the correct answer is D: The strip keeps the fire's disruption legible, while the ending shows Inez using inherited tradition to produce something not dictated by her grandfather.