Question 63·Hard·Nonlinear Functions
The function is defined by
The function is defined by . For what value of does reach its maximum?
For composite functions of the form , first notice whether is positive or negative: if , maximizing is the same as minimizing at the transformed input. Then reduce the problem by renaming the inner linear expression (like ) and analyze on its own. Look for algebraic simplifications or substitutions (such as rewriting as and letting ) that turn the expression into a simple pattern like , which you can minimize using basic inequalities or symmetry, and finally convert back to using the linear relation.
Hints
Look at the structure of
Focus on how is built from . Since , what happens to when gets larger or smaller?
Rename the inside of
Try setting so that you can think about minimizing instead of . Then write and see if you can simplify the second term.
Use a substitution for the powers of 2
After you notice that , let and rewrite in terms of . Then ask: for , when is as small as possible?
Convert back to
Once you know the value of that makes smallest, use the equation to solve for the corresponding value of that gives the maximum of .
Desmos Guide
Enter the function
In Desmos, type f(x) = 2^(x-1) + 2^(1-x) to define the function .
Enter the function
On a new line, type g(x) = 5 - 3*f(2*x + 4) so that Desmos graphs the composite function .
Find the maximum of
Adjust the viewing window (for example, set from about -4 to 2) until you can clearly see the highest point of the graph of . Click on that highest point; Desmos will display its coordinates. The -coordinate of this maximum point is the value of you should choose from the answer options.
Step-by-step Explanation
Connect maximizing to minimizing
The function is defined by
Because the coefficient of is (negative), as gets larger, gets smaller, and as gets smaller, gets larger.
So, to maximize , we need to minimize the value of .
Introduce a simpler variable for the input of
Let
Then we are trying to minimize , where
Once we find the value of that minimizes , we will convert that back to using .
Rewrite in a more convenient form
Notice that
So if we let
then and
Now the problem becomes: for , when is as small as possible?
Find the minimum of and solve for
For any positive number , the expression is minimized at (you can see this from symmetry, by AM-GM, or by checking values like and noticing it increases when you move away from 1). At , we get
and this is the smallest possible value.
Since , the condition means
Recall that , so
Thus reaches its maximum at .