For a function question, identify the claim immediately before the underlined sentence, then determine whether the sentence supports it, limits it, or introduces a competing explanation. Finally, connect that role to the evidence that follows; pay particular attention to whether a sentence shows that evidence is conclusive or merely compatible with more than one account.
Hints
- Hint 1
Compare the two accounts
Identify what the researchers infer before the underlined sentence and what hypothetical possibility the sentence introduces.
- Hint 2
Focus on the modal wording
Consider what the phrase “would be expected” implies about whether the initial choices uniquely support one explanation.
- Hint 3
Examine the follow-up test
Ask what becomes possible to test when the directions are no longer available.
Step-by-step
- Step 1
Identify the initial interpretation
Some researchers infer from the participants' route selections that verbal encoding had replaced spatial memory.
- Step 2
Analyze the alternative account
The underlined sentence explains that the same selections could occur even if spatial memory remained intact: participants might consult the directions only when the rotated map left more than one route plausible. The initial behavior therefore does not distinguish between replacement and retention.
- Step 3
Connect the sentence to the follow-up
The follow-up removes access to the directions and tests participants' knowledge of landmark positions. Their above-chance performance provides the additional evidence needed to determine whether spatial information remained available.