For a difficult words-in-context question, distinguish the precise nature of the change from its effects. Check whether each choice adds an unsupported evaluation, describes only a consequence, or overstates the scope of the change; then select the word that accounts for both what is preserved and what is altered.
Hints
- Hint 1
Separate the local and overall effects
Consider what viewers can infer from one cut to the next and what they cannot determine until the wider view appears.
- Hint 2
Distinguish the system from its outcome
Determine whether continuity editing itself is postponed or whether its familiar devices remain active while one result they ordinarily produce is delayed.
Step-by-step
- Step 1
Identify what Vos preserves
Eyeline matches and shot-reverse-shot patterns still allow viewers to follow local relationships across individual cuts. Thus, Vos continues to use recognizable continuity-editing principles.
- Step 2
Determine what Vos changes
By delaying the establishing shot, Vos makes the familiar devices support only tentative local inferences at first rather than immediately establishing a stable spatial layout.
- Step 3
Compare the choices precisely
Although the stable overall layout is deferred, continuity editing itself is not: its familiar devices remain active throughout the scene. The method changes how those preserved devices function together without improving or reversing the system, so “reconfiguration” is the most precise description.