A question about what both authors would agree on tests whether you can find a point supported by both texts. Start with the question so you know you're looking for agreement, then put each text's main claim in a few words. Ask yourself, what point do both texts support? They can disagree about causes or next steps and still share a fact, so check that each text supports the same point. A claim from only one author isn't enough.
Hints
- Hint 1
Start with what each text says composting does. In Text 1, read the sentence about turning organic materials into soil.
- Hint 2
What does Text 2's 20 percent finding tell you, and how does it connect to Text 1? Look for a point both authors support.
Step-by-step
Find the shared claim
Step 1Find Text 1's claim
Text 1 says turning organic materials into soil brings measurable declines in landfill volume and methane emissions. What point should we test for agreement with Text 2? Composting cuts the waste going to landfills. The concern about communities hesitating explains why programs may not start, but it doesn't take away that benefit.
- Step 2
Connect the study to that claim
Does Text 2 support the same point? Cities offering curbside compost collection reduced landfill contributions by an average of 20 percent within five years. That's a one-fifth drop in what those cities sent to landfills, so the study shows a large drop in waste.
- Step 3
Check the choices against both texts
Which statement stays within what both texts say? Neither author links residents' interest to whether they save money, calls finding space to build new landfills the main challenge, or says private companies are better suited than local governments. The choice with meaningfully reduce states the shared benefit of less landfill waste, which the study's large drop supports. Choice D.