Question 15·Hard·Two-Variable Data: Models and Scatterplots
A chemist records the mass , in milligrams, of a radioactive sample at various times , in minutes. When she graphs versus , the data are closely approximated by the line
Based on this model, which equation best describes the mass as a function of time ?
When a problem gives a linear model for a logarithm like or but asks for a model for , first rewrite the given line carefully and note which quantity is logged. Then use the inverse relationship between logs and exponentials: if , exponentiate both sides with base to solve for . Finally, match your result to the choices, checking that it makes sense for the context (for radioactive decay, should decrease over time and stay positive).
Hints
Focus on what the equation actually models
The given line is an equation for versus . Are you being asked for a formula for or for itself?
Think about inverse operations
If you know equals some expression, what operation can you apply to both sides to isolate ? Recall that is a logarithm with base .
Apply that inverse operation carefully
Take your equation and apply the same operation to both sides. What does simplify to?
Desmos Guide
Graph the given linear model for
Enter the line from the problem as y = 4.6 - 0.029x. This represents as a function of .
Test each answer choice by taking its natural log
For each option, define a function for in terms of (time) and then graph its natural log:
- For A: type
g(x) = ln(4.6 - 0.029x). - For B: type
h(x) = ln(e^(4.6 - 0.029x)). - For C: type
k(x) = ln(4.6*(0.971)^x). - For D: type
p(x) = ln(e^(-4.6 + 0.029x)).
Compare the graphs to the original line
Look at which of the new graphs of lies exactly on top of the original line y = 4.6 - 0.029x for all where it’s defined. The corresponding -formula is the correct answer.
Step-by-step Explanation
Interpret what is being graphed
The problem says the chemist graphs versus and the points lie near the line
That means this equation is a model for the natural logarithm of the mass, not for the mass itself.
Plan to solve for instead of
We want an equation with alone as a function of . Right now we have on the left. The natural log function and the exponential function are inverses, so applying to both sides will undo the on the left.
Start from
and apply the exponential with base to both sides of the equation:
Exponentiate and simplify to get
Exponentiating both sides gives
Because , this simplifies to
This matches choice B, so the correct model is .